alan tani @ alantani.com fishing reel repair rebuild tutorial isn't it time for fully waterproof conventional reels.
Fishing Reel Repair by Alan Tani
May 23, 2013, 12:06:49 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: isn't it time for fully waterproof conventional reels.  (Read 1669 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
hafnor
Member
*
Online Online

Posts: 288



« on: December 02, 2011, 11:25:18 AM »

Since the launch of the  daiwa saltiga spinner in 2001 the reel manufacturers have been strugling making reels fully waterproof. We all know that both the shimano stella and saltiga have waterproof drag and almost a waterproof house. The new saltiga has 100% waterproof body, so how come the conventional reel series have fallen so far behind. If you dunnk a conv. reel it will be soaking inside and you have to bring it to service or take it apart yourself ], cleaning all bearings, drags etc. The configuration of a conv. reel is much more simple than a spinner, so how come? instead of drilling a hole on the body of the conv. reel because it is not supposed to be waterproof. why not just slap on some rubber there and you never have to worry about service? Is it possible?
Logged
alantani
admin
Administrator
Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 7843



« Reply #1 on: December 02, 2011, 02:23:29 PM »

drags are easy.  we do that here all the time.  non-exposed metal surfaces are easy too.  the trick is preventing corrosion in the bearings.  everything else is good.  alan
Logged

for questions, send an e-mail to alantani@yahoo.com
Norcal Pescador
Redding, CA
Global Moderator
Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 1281



« Reply #2 on: December 02, 2011, 02:55:25 PM »

Trying to keep the water from getting in between the spool and sideplates would be a major issue. In order to get a good seal, the reel would have no freespool. Sad  Any other place could use o-rings or gaskets. Okay for rock-codding with 3 pound weights but in any other application, I see headaches. Undecided  IMHO
Logged

Rob

Classic USA Penns - 9MF 85 100 285 (2x)500L 501 111 113H 113HL 113HN 114H 50V  Smiley  One lonely Newell S220-5 and some freshwater stuff, too. Grin

Oceanside Senior Anglers
Humboldt Area Saltwater Anglers
Alto Mare
Moderator
Member
***
Online Online

Posts: 3490


Southeastern Pennsylvania


« Reply #3 on: December 02, 2011, 03:18:50 PM »

Trying to keep the water from getting in between the spool and sideplates would be a major issue. In order to get a good seal, the reel would have no freespool. Sad  Any other place could use o-rings or gaskets. Okay for rock-codding with 3 pound weights but in any other application, I see headaches. Undecided  IMHO

Or you could simply keep it in a Ziplock bag  Wink

I think that a reel needs to be able to let the water that gets in drain out. Having a "waterproof"  reel might work against you, especially if some water gets in and it can't come out. Just my opinion Wink
Logged

Forget about all the reasons why something may not work. You only need to find one good reason why it will.
Keta
D'oh!
Moderator
Member
***
Online Online

Posts: 1941


Klamath Falls, OR US


« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2011, 04:43:24 PM »

Nothing is "water proof" but with a labyrinth type seal one might be able to keep most water out of the spool bearings and side plate.  It would make the reel wider though.  Titanium frame, spool, internals and fasteners and protected bearings might get you "water resistant".
Logged

Molon Labe
 Hi, my name is Lee and I have a fishing gear problem.
A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way.
Mark Twain
Squirmypug
Member
*
Online Online

Posts: 178


Jacksonville Florida


« Reply #5 on: December 02, 2011, 11:25:50 PM »

I have had an idea for a fully seaded conv reel for a while.. It really isn't that hard of a thing to do, but if it was fully sealed and water got in you may not know it and ruin the reel  Undecided
Logged

I'm not talkin' 'bout pleasure boatin' or day sailin'. I'm talkin' 'bout workin' for a livin'. I'm talkin' 'bout sharkin'!
kamuwela
Moderator
Member
***
Online Online

Posts: 883


« Reply #6 on: December 03, 2011, 12:45:48 AM »

imho the weep hole on conventional reels also act as a breather hole to remove condensation. how would you prevent the water from entering from between the spool and frame? im sure like everything else in time we will see a water proof reel.
Logged
qcguy4198
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 34


« Reply #7 on: December 03, 2011, 02:54:51 AM »

I wouldn't buy a reel that is advertised as being "Waterproof". For a manufacturer to even get close to being able to make that claim....they'd have to design in so much B.S. that I'd rather not even try to go there. Further...once owning such a reel, you have 2 choices...TRUST that it's truly waterproof and don't try to get into it. Trust the manufacturer...(until it locks up..!!!)or have to work around all the "features" that they added to try and achieve "waterproof" results when your own common sense is telling you to get in there and do some maintenance.
Most of us who come to this board have already made the commitment to "get into" our reels to varying degrees.
That doesn't apply to the average Wally-World buyer, so there might be a market there, but it might be hard to beat the $24.95 combos you simply toss and replace every year.
Logged
Squirmypug
Member
*
Online Online

Posts: 178


Jacksonville Florida


« Reply #8 on: December 03, 2011, 03:50:39 PM »

kamuwela, the spool gap would still be open just need to rinse off or dunk after use.The reel would need a live spindle(think thats what its called) like the Penn Torque. With only a small hole in the right side plate with a seal for the spindle to go through, open bearings oiled or sealed packed with grease the seal would not change freespool.After that its only the handle/drag access that needs to be sealed and that would be just as easy.It would have a little more resistance when cranking line in but should be minimal.
Logged

I'm not talkin' 'bout pleasure boatin' or day sailin'. I'm talkin' 'bout workin' for a livin'. I'm talkin' 'bout sharkin'!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.164 seconds with 15 queries.