Reel Repair by Alan Tani

General Maintenance Tips => Tools and Lubricants => Topic started by: JGB on June 16, 2012, 03:42:44 AM

Title: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: JGB on June 16, 2012, 03:42:44 AM
Here is a pic of 2 iron finishing nails (about 1.2" in length). One treated with TSI 321 and the other treated with Yamalube.
Both were submerged is synthetic sea water for 6 months. They were then removed and wiped clean.

Can you guess which is which????

Jim N.
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Dominick on June 16, 2012, 04:26:35 AM
My vote is the corroded nail was treated with TSI 321.  Do I win anything?  Dominick
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Nessie Hunter on June 16, 2012, 04:36:20 AM
Taking a walk on the wild side here....

With the time frames Alan has talked about with his TSI  (2 years now)..
Plus I have had excellent results also...

Im going to guess the Good Nail was the TSI nail...    ????
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Nuvole on June 16, 2012, 04:57:56 AM
My guess corroded nail = TSI.
Or else I'll have to pay expensive shipping to get some.
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: alantani on June 16, 2012, 05:13:45 AM
hmmmmmm.......  i'm going to go against the flow here and guess yamaha marine grease.
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Bryan Young on June 16, 2012, 05:35:08 AM
leap of faith...I'd say the clean nail is yamalube.
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: alantani on June 16, 2012, 05:56:32 AM
if it's not the yamalube, then there are alot of outboard engines out there that are in trouble.   ;D
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Dave Bentley on June 16, 2012, 01:54:50 PM
Yamaha Lube on the good one for me.
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: suitekids on June 16, 2012, 02:09:02 PM
I'd say the corroded nail had the yammi on it, I think there was some confusion on yamalube and yamalube marine grease, they are different animals
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Bryan Young on June 16, 2012, 04:14:42 PM
I'm sure we are only talking about Yamalube Marine grease and not the general or wheel bearing grease.
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Dr. Jekyll - AKA MeL B on June 16, 2012, 04:57:11 PM
Quote from: Pescachaser on June 16, 2012, 04:26:35 AM
My vote is the corroded nail was treated with TSI 321.  Do I win anything?  Dominick

x2 because IMO any type of grease will last longer than oil.
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: JGB on June 17, 2012, 06:24:57 AM
Ok here is the scoop. ???


The corroded nail is the Yamalube. The finely pitted nail (right side) is the TSI. Yes the Yamalube is the marine version (dark blue before they changed the formulation to pale blue). The Yamalube nails were rolled between the fingers with Yamalube trying to force good adhesion to the nails (3 of them). The thickness of the Yamalube varied from a thin layer to thick enough to stick the nails together. Keep in mind that this test was with plain old iron that will rust in the rain.

Here is what I think is happening here.
The corroded nail still has some areas that did not corrode. I think the Yamalube stayed in place. In the other corroded areas it looks like the corrosion undermined the yamalube. Remember this is a 6 month test. Plenty of time for corrosion to go under the protective layer.
In simple terms any pinhole through the lube will corrode and corrosion can migrate under the Yamalube since Yamalube does not flow.
The TSI will flow and spread to cover the metal 100% inside and out like water in a sponge. Also it  will not allow corrosion to undermine and any corrosion will be forced free and undermined by the TSI

There was free rust staining in the water with the TSI with only a film of sludgy rusty like paste with the TSI. The Yamalube had growths of rusty paste 3 or 4 times the diameter of the nails indicating the rust once formed stayed in place.

Too bad TSI is not compatible with grease.

Short term test with SS bearing showed no rust at all with TSI. Howerver salt crystals can form around the balls seizing the bearings until rinsed in fresh water or the bearing is forced to turn breaking the crystals apart. If there was grease there would be no salt crystals as the grease would occupy the space.

Jim N.
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: suitekids on June 17, 2012, 06:38:18 AM
Is there a prize?  ::)
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Nuvole on June 17, 2012, 07:53:44 AM
This is unbelievable! Now I'm gonna pay for expensive shipping to bring some TSI over after all. 
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Keith K on June 17, 2012, 01:51:47 PM
Really interesting experiment.  I would have bet money the other way...

Thanks Jim!
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Dr. Jekyll - AKA MeL B on June 17, 2012, 02:09:14 PM
yes unbelievable! are both synthetic based or mineral based? i don't have both so  ???
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Jimmer on June 17, 2012, 02:50:07 PM
Jim - Do you think we should forget the grease and just use TSI 301/321? Do you know if the TSI works as well on aluminum, brass. bronze, anodized alum and stainless as it does on iron? ( I'm assuming by iron you mean steel?)
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Dr. Jekyll - AKA MeL B on June 17, 2012, 03:45:41 PM
answered my own question by googling...
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: JGB on June 18, 2012, 01:30:21 AM
I suspect you would get similar results with other types of metals. The only way to know for sure is to test it. I think that the results will be less severe for metals that do not form encrusting oxides.

Grease has it's place and that is for prevention of galling and wear under very high loads ( like pinion bearings and left side spool bearings).
Grease also does an excellent job of occupying space where we do not water to be. I believe that in the case of bearings that grease will fair better than the test indicates. This is because the rolling balls will continuously redistribute the grease and the undermining would be reduced or eliminated.

Wouldn't it be great if metal bearings could be treated with TSI and then cleaned and greased. Best of both worlds but TSI will exclude the grease just like it excludes rust.

Now here is a compromise: I mix 10-15% TSI321 with corrosionX and it blends with no problem (TSI seems to be compatible with oil).The TSI will migrate to the metal and the thicker CorrosionX will act as a very light grease. I use this for handle knobs. reel seat rivets and harness lugs to kill corrosion. Seems to work but is not quite 100%. My steel crimping tool will still get a few spots of rust over 6 months time and my steel needle nose (constantly getting submerged in salt water) will need re-lubing  every couple of months.


Jim N.
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: redsetta on June 18, 2012, 02:11:40 AM
Really enjoying this thread Jim - it's great info and much appreciated.
Thanks, Justin
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Bruce on June 18, 2012, 02:42:57 AM
I would bet it has to do with the specific geravity of the oil/grease.
Tryit with some Kroil as well or vs the TSI.
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: JGB on June 18, 2012, 06:07:37 AM
Did a little experiment.

Tried to blend YamaLube and TSI. At first the TSI wanted to stay separate from the YL. Kind of like water and teflon.
After a little coaxing started to blend and did mix into a homogeneous mixture (grease is basically oil thickened with  particles).
Did the same with Lubriplate 101 (mineral oil and calcium) and it mixed right in. Lubbriplate 101 is almost a thick oil and has no additives for corrosion.

Repeated the nail test in sea water for the following samples containg 3 coated 1" steel finishing nails each.

1 YamaLube (new version) only
2 YamaLube (new version) + TSI
3 Lubriplate + TSI

I will report as the nails begins to show visual signs of corrosion (48 hours to 1 month).

Second test - applied mixtures of TSI and YamaLube and Lubriplate + TSI to open ball bearings.
We want to see if the grease separates and begins to slough off or remain homogeneous as a grease mixture in the bearings.
We do know that if you add TSI to already greased bearings the grease will separate off the metal but for this test we are starting off with a homogeneous mixture. Lets hope the results are promising.

Jim N.
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Bryan Young on June 18, 2012, 06:12:28 AM
Jim,

Thanks.  I guess the comparisons could be endless.  Can you add pics of what you are doing?  Now it is soaking?  What is looks like when you first put it in the water?

Bryan
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: JGB on June 18, 2012, 06:16:00 PM
Here are several pic to look at. Results are not as promising as we would like ???


Initial samples with 6 month sample on the right
the rest are microscope pics after 12 hours.

The Yama Lube is not doing well and the grease blob shows that it is absorbing water.
The Yama Lube + TSI is doing better but still shows corrosion. interesting that some of the Yama Lube has sloughed off with no corrosion (TSI must have attached to the metal)
The Lubriplate 101 + TSI has no corrosion and still has a good even coat with no signs of water absorption. It is a mineral oil based grease so will degrade with time as it is basically refined Dino oil.

Jim N.
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Bryan Young on June 18, 2012, 10:09:32 PM
Thanks Jim.  I used to have tons of tubes...I wonder if in the garage.  Wouldn't mind checking additional grease, such as Triple Guard, CorrosionX and Triple Guard blended with regular CorrosionX in comparision.
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Rockfish1 on June 19, 2012, 12:58:48 AM
Jim,
I'm no tribologist, but here's what I think might be happening from a chemistry point of view:  I'm thinking that when you mix the Yammie grease and the TSI 301 that the initial failure to mix well followed by finally going together is because the quick flashing solvent in the TSI 301 doesn't mix well, then evaporats leaving the synthetic oil part and once the solvent is gone they appear to mix.  Then I think that you're getting the spotty corrosion because they didn't actually go together chemically (one isn't "miscible" in the other) and you get some spots on the nail where the TSI is predominant and some where it's the Yammie grease.  Got no proof - but it sure makes sense to me.

A couple of comments on the grease:  The Yammie grease is made by Chemtool in IL.....so is Lubrimatic brand "marine and wheel bearing" grease - BUT - the Yammie grease is an aluminum complex base and the Lubrimatic is a calcium sulfonate base.  According to all I can find out the aluminum complexes are pretty good, but cheaper and the calcium complexes are better yet but more expensive in terms of making a water insoluble corrosion resistant grease.  I though initially that maybe the blue grease that Alan hates because it's so sticky might be Lubrimatic, but upon looking closer the Lubrimatic is a "blue green" and the Yammie is all blue.  Now I'm thinking that maybe the grease he dislikes for being hard to remove is Triple Guard, which is pretty blue and sticks like glue to things I use it on like the prop shaft in an outboard....it's still there at the end of the season after being in and out of salty water all year.  As best I can tell Triple Guard is an aluminum complex base like the Yammie....but it seems heavier viscosity to me....it appears to be made by Bel-Ray in NJ.  As somebody noted - none of these things are "original" - they're all made by people who make a bunch of different grease/oil products and label them for others.

Also - to add another idea into the mix: I've been playing with Mercury Corrosion Guard......a spray on anti-corrosion coating that goes on wet and dries to a film sort of the way Boeshield does but sticky and dust-grabbing liek Boeshield.  It's made to protect outboard and outdrive components from corrosion.  I've sprayed a mower deck that had some rust spots on it with the stuff and been using it since last Summer at my place on the water - the film is still there and any rust action appears to be stopped dead.  It's safe for paints and from what I can see - plastic/rubber.  I'm thinking it might make a great anti-corrosion coating that resists dust and particle attachment in the same way that I think Eezox might.  I'm trying Eezox on reel internals and foot rivets now.........haven't gotten around to the Merc stuff in a reel yet. 
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Rockfish1 on June 19, 2012, 01:23:35 PM
Oops.........meant to say that the Corrosion Guard film is NOT so tacky when dry like Boeshield is.......apparently my fingers are too big and can't type  >:(
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: alantani on June 20, 2012, 09:49:30 PM
we need a grease made up of tsi.
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Rockfish1 on June 21, 2012, 01:23:57 AM
Great idea!  Maybe as much as you and Jim have helped them sell.....they'd take such a suggestion seriously from you?  If they could get the 321 into a super duper corrosion resistant soap base like calcium sulfonate it might the the best #@* ever invented!  You da MAN!
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: suitekids on June 21, 2012, 09:42:45 AM
Quote from: Rockfish1 on June 21, 2012, 01:23:57 AM
Great idea!  Maybe as much as you and Jim have helped them sell.....they'd take such a suggestion seriously from you?  If they could get the 321 into a super duper corrosion resistant soap base like calcium sulfonate it might the the best #@* ever invented!  You da MAN!

Selling is good! shipping and getting are frustrating experience
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Rockfish1 on June 21, 2012, 01:14:17 PM
I didn't have any problem at all.....ordered a can of liquid and a spray can and got both three days later with no issues.
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: suitekids on June 21, 2012, 03:00:59 PM
I guess I'm not living right
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Rockfish1 on June 21, 2012, 05:44:10 PM
I ordered straight from TSI.......if you did as well - maybe they don't like to let Jersey stuff go to Florida....BWAAAAAAAAAA
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: suitekids on June 21, 2012, 06:17:34 PM
LOL, now you know why I moved away from there 36 yrs ago
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: alantani on June 22, 2012, 04:07:41 PM
bryan was over the other night and opened up the shipping box of tsi 301 with 12 cans inside.  they were all leaking!   :-\
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Pro Reel on June 22, 2012, 05:48:50 PM
were they leaking from a seam in the can or did it look like the solvent was eating the can?
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: alantani on June 22, 2012, 07:42:07 PM
it looks like they wer ALL leaking from around the cap.   :-\
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: exp2000 on August 22, 2013, 02:00:17 AM
What's happened to the pics in this thread?

None of the links work!
~
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: thedw on September 07, 2013, 06:57:03 AM
kinda irrelevant here, but is it ok if i coat bearings with TSI then pack with grease??? lol!!
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: echang on January 30, 2014, 12:16:10 PM
Last year I did a multi-month corrosion test with many of the oils and greases that I could find locally, about twenty five in total.  Here were my informal results based on observation:

Corrosion X was the best.  TSI 321 and Superlube teflon Grease tied for second.  Breakfree CLP 3rd. 

Cal's, Yamalube, Corrosion block spray, Boeshield, and Mobil 1 only mediocre at best with Cal's maybe a bit better of that lot. 

Surprises were that all of the rest of the automotive and marine greases performed poorly.  Oils such as Superlube Oil, WD 40 and 3-in-1 oil, Slick 50 teflon oil, and Rem Oil performed poorly.

I was going to post pictures but a big rain storm destroyed the poster board that the samples were glued to.


Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: alantani on January 30, 2014, 05:54:38 PM
alot of work.  thanks for the info!  corrosion x is great stuff!
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Mudguts on January 30, 2014, 10:03:08 PM
has anyone tried Inox MX8?
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: echang on January 30, 2014, 11:46:24 PM
Nah Alan, just bored I guess.  The Inox wasn't available locally at the time, so wasn't able to test it. 

Surprisingly, Eezox did not fair well at all.   I didn't know about Finish Line teflon grease back then ...would've love to test that one.  Another surprise was that the Superlube teflon grease faired way better by far than any of the other greases tested (but the same brand oil tested poorly).  Confusing though, because other corrosion tests available on the internet don't necessarily support my results.
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: alantani on January 30, 2014, 11:56:30 PM
Quote from: Mudguts on January 30, 2014, 10:03:08 PM
has anyone tried Inox MX8?

good stuff!
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: MFB on January 31, 2014, 05:41:41 AM
I use Inox mx6 for drag grease.

Rgds

Mark
Title: Re: TSI vs Yamalube corrosion protection in the extreeme
Post by: Mudguts on January 31, 2014, 08:42:45 AM
Quote from: MFB on January 31, 2014, 05:41:41 AM
I use Inox mx6 for drag grease.

Rgds

Mark

mx 6 is also good ;)